Wikipedia in the Middle of the Night. Can’t Sleep.
When my sons were very young, I would sometimes ask them what they’d like to be in life. For a MacGuffin, I’d mention that when I was young, I thought for a long time about this very question, and then wrote down my conclusion on a sheet of paper, which I had put in a special blue envelope someplace in the attic. But I had forgotten where. Would they help me find it? I needed it now because I had some free time coming up and I wanted to do some of what was written on the paper. Then we would talk as we searched. On one of these occasions, one of my sons talked about a story he had heard on the news, of someone famous whose garbage was searched in an attempt to find out more about him. What, my son asked, do you call the person doing the searching?
I wondered if he was getting suspicious.
As we leisurely looked at old boxes of books and papers, I told him that such a person was a garbologist, and went to school to study garbology, to learn how to do this, before actually setting out to explore people’s trash. He said then, that he no longer wanted to be an Elvis impersonator when he grew up. He wanted to be a garbologist.
I have only recently learned from a wikipedia article that the terms garbology and garbologist exist, and have been around for some time, and that garbology is an academic major dealing with modern refuse. This amused me. And with too much time on my hands now this led me to wonder again at the nature of man. About how ideas occur independently in separate places but around the same time, and are pursued in somewhat different ways. Commonly cited examples include the development of calculus, the development of writing, the invention of the telephone, and who knows what else. I wondered to what extent these events are independent, and whether your concept of independence is the same as mine or the next person’s. Perhaps there’s some shared sense that the time is right for a logical next step in a process whose end we cannot see, because it is defined by the process, by us, always changing and receding faster than we can pursue it, entropy itself generating entropy, and order circling in upon itself until it vanishes into the next dimension which, when it gets enough order, will have its own big bang. The logic is our invention too, you know. The way we knew a process was logical was that we made up the logic as we went along, then went where the logic pointed. The tangent was always a straight line, but our direction never was. The horrors of the twentieth century prevent me from calling this process progress.
Most of the items on my “to do” list will never be done, of course. When my life ends, not soon I hope, I will not have learned Aramaic or Coptic. I will not have read more than a small fraction of nineteenth century philosophy. I will have known but a vanishingly small fraction of those of my time. And yet it is nearly enough for my scope. When our activities are focused around what we love, we use our time wisely.
I still haven’t adopted a fixed perspective on cultural relativism and its problems, or logical positivism and falsification, because I don’t know enough about language and its influence on our concepts to feel any confidence in an evaluative process. I feel fixed in time, and that time is passing. I think I can appreciate it for what it was. Yes, there was a feeling of intellectual excitement: we can finally get it right, clarify our terms, end the madness. And to have felt some of it during Friday night pizza and espresso and Chinatown and pastrami on rye fueled discussions, optimism a buzz lasting the weekend until Sunday midnight when the libraries closed without an answer, and still digesting until Wednesday, when you knew that this Friday you had to raise the case of …. It was fun.
Then graduate studies come to an uneven bumpy end. Fred decided on law school in Alabama. Susan was law school in New York. Connie, already wealthy, began to travel. Me on Wall Street. Family. Move to someplace nice where the boys can hike and swim. Thank you Fred and Susan and Connie and the rest of you, wherever you may be. It was fun. Maybe now I can get some sleep.
| 2.5 |
February 6th, 2008 at 10:20 am
Word on the street is that these days, all the Garbologists are tackling this monster:
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/12/are-there-reall.html
February 6th, 2008 at 1:04 pm
Here is an updated article:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/the-worlds-rubbish-dump-a-garbage-tip-that-stretches-from-hawaii-to-japan-778016.html
February 11th, 2008 at 10:52 am
<p>It is hardly a secret that refuse laws are quite lax in the eastern hemisphere. This, after years of garbological research, I have determined to be the primary cause for the floating island of Garbage mentioned by my most astute colleague, Mr. Langdon. </p>
<p>My personal theory is that a New World Garbological Coalition will be formed to harness the kinetic dampening effects of Garbage Island into a version of former President Ronald Regan’s “Star Wars” defense shield that is more within the budgetary constraints of the coming generation. In fact, with modern advancements in sustainable military defense, using projectile refuse is a very “green” solution to costly and wasteful spending on traditional metal and powder weapons.</p>
Untouched by editor, but lol - Robert
February 11th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
I don’t know why, but I laughed out loud at the mention of “garbology” and “garbologists”. They’re just really funny words, I guess.
Your mention of common ideas throughout human consciousness reminded me a lot of the ancient, anachronistic, Aztec model planes:
http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_7.htm
February 15th, 2008 at 11:08 am
LOL! Garbologist! So that’s what they call it.. I guess I was a closet garbologist all of the time and never knew it. I am taking steps to change that part of my life.. Is the collection of all of this stuff a metaphor for a deeper spiritual meaning? Hmmmm!
What is the opposite of garbologist? Minimalist?
You have brought up many questions now that I must ponder, thanks again for a great post and subject for reflecting.
February 21st, 2008 at 11:27 am
What a remarkably fascinating post! I found myself laughing at the whole notion of you guys digging around in the attic and playing off the word “garbologist” (which for some reason makes me think of Ed Norton), but then you mix in a wonderful dose of philosophy that I have to agree with. I just can’t believe in such huge coincidences in the world that people thousands of miles apart from each other can have the same exact crazy leaps of discovery. There just has to be some amount of pre-programmed information inside all of our genes.